The Higher Regional Court of Cologne has now clarified in a ruling dated May 15, 2025, file number 18 U 97/23, under what conditions premium obligations exist in the open house procedure, and what limits exist for asserting
The Higher Administrative Court (OVG) of Lüneburg, in its decision of May 19, 2025 (10 ME 33/25), ruled on the scope of the risk assessment by the evaluating Member State for a zonal authorization of plant protection products.
The CJEU judgment (Case C-581/23) of May 8, 2025, sets important standards for the antitrust assessment of exclusive distribution agreements within the EU regarding exclusive distribution rights.
The Bavarian Higher Regional Court (BayObLG) deals not only with fundamental public procurement law issues but also with the requirements for evaluating tenders in public procurement law.
Public procurement procedures are intended to ensure equal opportunities. But what happens when a bidder has exclusive information from previous project involvement that gives them a competitive advantage due to a knowledge lead?
In its ruling dated 07.05.2025 (Ref. 16 K 6623/22), the VG Düsseldorf decided on the requirements for permissibility and the minimum distance to betting shops.
Many property owners, investors and local authorities are regularly faced with the question: Why is building in outdoor areas so complicated?
Anyone wishing to offer "purchase on account" in online retail must in future comply with transparency obligations in advertising in order to avoid risking a warning.
In the HUK-Coburg v. Check24 case, the ECJ ruled that an online comparison portal that does not offer insurance itself is not to be considered an advertiser within the meaning of comparative advertising
AVANTCORE Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB
Hohenzollernstr. 1 70178 Stuttgart
T: +49 711 674411-0 F: +49 711 674411-11 M: office@avantcore.de
EN 
DE