Results for „EAR"
41 results
News
- Waste illegally dumped on openly accessible land: property owners are not required to bear disposal costs
- Permissibility of the use of third-party marks as AdWords remains unclear
- Warning notice for file-sharing – what should be done?
- Early-bird discount for late bookers anti-competitive?
- Costs for internet subscription services must be clearly recognisable
- Limited product supply requires clear notification to avoid misleading the consumer
- Is listing goods under a false search category unlawful?
- Trade mark cancellation due to lack of distinctive character after four years?
- Advertising slogan "400 years of brewing tradition" misleading?
- A Heart for Typo Domains
- Copyright protection for a recurring image motif?
- The Lindt Teddy is not a Gold Bear
- Imitation of luxury handbags
- Film adaptations of historical novels – The Popess
- Pitfalls in the Revocation of Filming Rights
- Damages for the inventor of the birthday train?
- No early porting of fixed-line number
- Statute of limitations for file sharing after 10 years?
- Filesharing lawsuit from law firm Negele dismissed
- Electrical appliances without EAR registration – permissible for trade?
- Amazon offer with unclear scope anticompetitive?
- New File-Sharing Decisions on the Burden of Pleading?
- Violation of personality rights in retrospect?
- The Gold Bears – Lindt wins against Haribo
- Misleading advertising with 100 years of business tradition?
- Freedom of Art vs. Right to Personality – 'Fear' prevails
- Search result on Amazon – trade mark infringement?
- Reporting on Günther Jauch's adoptive daughters permitted
- Image search via search engines – copyright infringement?
- Instagram: Preliminary Injunction Against Influencer for Covert Advertising
- FOCUS physician seals in court: Higher Regional Court (OLG) Munich declares the seals "TOP-Mediziner" and "FOCUS-Empfehlung" permissible with clear decision
- Administrative Court of Appeal Munich quashes development plan due to violation of property protection – Judgment of 03.06.2025, Az. 9 N 22.2217
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH): PAYBACK points on the purchase of hearing aids are impermissible – the value limit for promotional gifts must not exceed €1 even for medical devices
- The Court of Justice of the European Union (EuGH) strengthens permit certainty in environmental impact assessment – no second hearing round for authority reports required
- Urgency in emergency proceedings: Higher Regional Court of Schleswig sends a clear message – delay leads to loss of legal protection, even in the Meta case
- Price marking with consequences: Higher Regional Court (OLG) Nuremberg prohibits unclear "−30%" labelling on perishable cheese
- Is "advertising with free" misleading when payment is made with data? The referral decision of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (EuGH) is intended to provide a clear clarification.
- At the Christmas market, the role of appearance is strengthened: the Higher Regional Court (OVG) Bremen grants municipalities greater scope for design through access restrictions in market admissions.
- Information rights in trade mark law: Federal Court of Justice sets clear limits on exhausted trade mark rights in online commerce
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH) clarifies the definition of distance learning: synchronous online instruction is not distance learning