Results for „App"
51 results
News
- Book price fixing applies to online retailers too – Amazon
- Application for Preliminary Injunction Against S21 Demolition Works Dismissed!
- Risk of confusion regarding "eiPott" for egg cups?
- Is advertising with areas of application to specialist audiences permitted?
- Bonatz heir unsuccessful in final appeal
- Sale of electrical appliances without VAT?
- Word mark or figurative mark – The dilemma of choice when filing a trademark application
- Infringement of an Apple iPad design by Samsung tablet?
- Advertising ban on mailboxes – does it also apply to advertising sheets with editorial content?
- Expiration of the principal licence – what happens to the derived sublicence?
- Apple trademark once again the world's most valuable brand in 2012
- Presumption rule in file-sharing cases does not apply to de facto connection holder
- Copyright protection now also for simple works of applied art!
- Apple also most valuable brand in the world in 2013
- German data protection law applies to Facebook
- Application for interim relief by the heir of Oskar Schlemmer dismissed
- Advertising household appliances – how to do it correctly?
- Claiming the Priority of a Patent Application
- Google surpasses Apple…
- Supervisory authorities can be wrong
- WhatsApp unreachable?
- Design of Apple Stores as a protectable mark?
- No free choice of language for terms and conditions
- Title protection for descriptive app designations?
- The "BAG" and the Appropriate Domain
- Competition law also applies to Amazon
- Electrical appliances without EAR registration – permissible for trade?
- No change from colour mark to figurative mark in application proceedings
- Bushido continues rapping for gold…!
- Apple displaces Google!
- Infringement of a Montblanc trademark by application on a watch?
- Apple guarantees contrary to competition law?
- Is the Smartphone App MyTaxi anti-competitive?
- WhatsApp must translate terms and conditions
- Google most valuable brand in 2016!
- Stars in the hotel coat of arms – hotel rating?
- Bushido remains on the index!
- Tagesschau App unlawful?
- Apple successful: no registration of "MI PAD"
- A discount "on all items" must really apply to everything!
- Zonal plant protection product approval: binding nature of risk assessment by the evaluating Member State
- Open-house procedures and price regulation: what does the ruling of the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Köln on the applicability of Price Ordinance 30/53 and the scope of damages claims mean for practice?
- Administrative Court of Appeal Munich quashes development plan due to violation of property protection – Judgment of 03.06.2025, Az. 9 N 22.2217
- Higher Regional Court Frankfurt (OLG Frankfurt) declares interim injunction inadmissible due to abuse of rights in filing the application
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decision: Former pharmaceutical price binding cannot be applied to EU mail-order pharmacies – mail-order pharmacies are permitted to grant bonuses
- Prohibition by the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Cologne – The use of "apple leather" as a product designation for vegan dog accessories is misleading because "apple leather" is not leather.
- The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decides on health-related advertising for botanicals and prohibits the use of health claims without EU approval – Judgment of 5 June 2025 (I ZR 109/22, "Botanicals II")
- Bavarian Administrative Court of Appeal confirms boundary development in inner courtyard: neighbouring party action against underground car park entrance fails definitively (Order of 15 August 2025)
- Neighbour's objection against construction of planned residential buildings fails before the Administrative Court Schleswig – no violation of subjective rights was apparent.
- At the Christmas market, the role of appearance is strengthened: the Higher Regional Court (OVG) Bremen grants municipalities greater scope for design through access restrictions in market admissions.